Flawed and Sometimes Deadly
Part 3: Some children disabled for life

Emily Houck, age 5. "Dr. Monsanto checked her and said she'll
be fine. Those were his exact words: She'll be fine. These words
haunt me now."
(Skip Peterson / Dayton Daily News)
|
State medical boards have trouble overseeing doctors in the military
because the boards were never designed to police physicians practicing
outside their borders. Investigators in some states have no authority
or budget to conduct investigations in other states, and many
of the laws and safeguards imposed by states to protect the public
don't apply to military doctors.
On May 18, 1992, the mother of a child who contracted meningitis
filed a $10 million claim against the Navy, alleging Dr. Edner
C. Monsanto, the chief pediatrician at the Navy base in Kings
Bay, Ga., missed the diagnosis. The child is disabled for life.
The Navy paid $2 million.
"We could find no quality review board that he went through that
you would find in a civilian hospital after an incident," said
Joshua A. Whitman, a Jacksonville, Fla., attorney.
Georgia requires that such incidents be reported to the medical
board through a variety of sources, including insurance companies.
"That would be a standard of care issue and an investigation would
be launched," said Kara Jones, spokeswoman for the Georgia medical
board. "My opinion is that it would be brought to our attention."
But Monsanto didn't have a Georgia medical license, and the $2
million wasn't paid by an insurance company that might have increased
the cost of his policy. Taxpayers paid it.
"Federal licensees are going to be exempt from our jurisdiction,"
Jones said. "We have to depend on the states that license them
to discipline."
The state that did license Monsanto - New York - didn't even require
him to maintain the registration there. His registration lapsed
in February 1997, a violation of military guidelines and a reportable
offense under the New York medical board rules - had he worked
in New York.
"A doctor who doesn't practice in New York doesn't have to maintain
an active registration," said Rita St.John, who oversees the disciplinary
unit for the New York Division of Professional Licensing.
Thirteen months after the Navy settled the meningitis case, it
settled a case involving another injured child who had received
treatment from Monsanto.
Emily Houck was taken to see Monsanto several days after she was
born. She had tiny blisters on her head, and Monsanto suspected
herpes, which he later acknowledged could have been treated with
a toothpaste-sized tube of ointment.
But he didn't give her the ointment. Four days later, Emily returned,
running a fever and losing weight.
"Dr. Monsanto checked her and said she'll be fine," said Emily's
mother, Debbie Houck. "Those were his exact words: She'll be fine.
These words haunt me now."
Emily, now 5, will never be fine.
The fever she later developed from the infection damaged her brain.
She cannot speak. She cannot walk. She cannot see. She cannot
hear. She rarely smiles. She spends her days in a $5,000 wheelchair
or rolling on the carpet.
"She does not cry. She kind of yells. We've deciphered which yell
is for what," her mother said.

Attorney John S. Myers stands outside the submarine base at Kings
Bay, Ga., where Emily Houck was treated. Myers sued the Navy on
behalf of the Houck family, winning $4.2 million. Military doctors
are protected from direct lawsuits. (Skip Peterson / Dayton Daily
News) |
Attorney John S. Myers of St.Marys, Ga., sued the Navy and won
$4.2 million for Emily and her family, bringing to more than $6
million the amount paid to Monsanto's patients by U.S. taxpayers
in a 13-month period. Monsanto's official record remains unblemished.
Monsanto couldn't be named as a defendant in a lawsuit because
he was a military physician.
Monsanto also has no record of disciplinary action with the State
Federation of Medical Boards, the clearinghouse used by medical
boards across the country. And Navy records show that Kings Bay
has never reported a disciplinary action to the National Practitioners
Data Bank, which is used by hospitals across the United States
to screen doctors.
Monsanto still works at Kings Bay. He did not respond to messages
left on his home and work phones.
States must trust military supervision
With doctors practicing so far from the states where they're licensed,
state medical boards are forced to depend on the military for
information. But the military is sometimes reluctant to criticize
its doctors, even to state medical boards.
"It (the military) is a good opportunity for physicians with problems
to hide out," said Dennis Carr, who retired a few months ago as
assistant director and chief of compliance for the Iowa Board
of Medical Examiners. "If they're a long way away, there's no
way to keep track of them."
Dr. Jerry L. Mothershead's Virginia medical board file shows he
went to work in 1987 at a Norfolk, Va., emergency room after he
had been drinking. That same year, while still in the Navy, he
got treatment, then reported to duty drunk again.
In 1988, he got more treatment, and in 1989, he started drinking
again. Between 1991 and 1994, he reported a dozen episodes of
drinking that lasted three-to-four days each. In March 1994, he
got treatment. A year later, his urine tested positive for alcohol,
prompting yet another treatment. In April 1995, Virginia medical
board records say, he drank vodka for "approximately one week"
before he was admitted to Portsmouth Naval Hospital.
In June 1996, Dr. W.A. McDonald, commander of the United States
Navy Medical Corps, wrote to the Virginia medical board:
"I have seen no evidence that Dr. Mothershead's alcoholism has
any current impact on his ability to practice medicine."
Mothershead is still in the Navy, working at Portsmouth Naval
Hospital in Virginia. Mothershead didn't return a telephone call,
but a Navy spokeswoman said he has been open and honest about
his drinking.
"He knows he's got an alcohol problem," she said.
Department of Defense officials said the military handles doctors
who abuse drugs or alcohol differently than civilian health officials
do.
"Rather than reporting these individuals, we encourage them to
seek treatment," says a written statement from military health
officials. "The decision to approach this issue in this manner
is based on the premise that colleagues will help one another
to seek treatment much sooner than they will step forward to report
such behavior in a fellow practitioner."
next: Military slow to report bad doctors to states
day 1 index:
part 1: Flawed and sometimes deadly
part 2: A secret system of medicine
part 3: Some children disabled for life
part 4: Military slow to report bad doctors to states
part 5: Patients passed from doctor to doctor
part 6: Questionable doctors hired
Index | day 1 | day 2 | day 3 | day 4 | day 5 | day 6 | day 7 | follow
|